Patna High CourtCR. MISC./38869/2019bail granted

Md. Sarfaraj @ Sarfaraj v. The State Of Bihar

2019-12-05Justice Smt. Anjana Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38869 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-216 Year-2018 Thana- SIKTI District- Araria ====================================================== Md. Sarfaraj @ Sarfaraj S/o Late Jainuddin Resident of Village- Hariyabara Ward No.11, P.S.- Araria, District- Araria.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Gopal Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Damodar Prasad Tiwary, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 05-12-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the State. The petitioner is in custody since 02.12.2018, in connection with Sikty (Bardaha) P.S. Case No. 216 of 2018, G.R. No. 3776 of 2018, for the offences under Sections 379, 411/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was taken into custody on suspicion and is languishing in jail for one year.

Considering the period of custody, and that apart from the present case this petitioner has implicated in two other cases, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38869 of 2019(4) dt.05-12-2019 2/2 Chief Judicial Magistrate, Araria, in connection with Sikty (Bardaha) P.S. Case No. 216 of 2018, G.R. No. 3776 of 2018 subject to the following conditions:

1. One of the bailors shall be blood relative of the petitioner.

2. The petitioner shall not indulge himself in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

3. The petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of his failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned court concerned.

4. The petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (Anjana Mishra, J) uma/- U T