Rahul Kumar v. The Union Of India,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2015 of 2019 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.206 of 2018 ====================================================== Rahul Kumar Son of Shri Krishna Murari Prasad Resident of Village Khujagachhi P.S. Barbigha District Sheikhpura. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The Union of India, Through the Inspector General of Police, Central Reserve Police force (C.R.P.F) having Officer at Digha Ashiyana Road Bihar Section C.R.P.F, P.O. P.S. Digha Town and District Patna namely M.S. Bhatiya.

2.

The Deputy Inspector General of Police Central Reserve Police Force (C.R.P.F) having Office at Group Central C.R.P.F Mokama Ghat Town and District Patna namely Niraj Kumar 3.

The Commandant having Office at DIGP, Group Centre, Central Reserve Police Force Mokama Ghat Town and District Patna namely Anil Minz. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Arun Kumar, Advocate Mr. Ram Vinay Prasad Singh, Advocate For the UOI :

Mr. A.K. Pandey, SCGC Mr. R.K. Sharma, CGC ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 04-07-2023 Heard the parties.

The contempt petition has been preferred for compliance of the order dated 2.8.2018 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 206 of 2018.

A supplementary show cause duly put an affidavit on 3.7.2023 by the DIG (Administration), IGP office, Bihar Sector, CRPF, Rajiv Nagar, Patna has been filed incorporating office order dated 28.6.2023 issued by the office of DIGP, GC, CRPF, Mokamaghat by which the service of the petitioner has been

Patna High Court MJC No.2015 of 2019(7) dt.04-07-2023 2/2 terminated from same date i.e. 24.8.2017 (Annexure-R/3 to the supplementary show cause).

It has been submitted by Mr. Awadhesh Kumar Pandey that a copy has already been received by Mr. Ram Vinay Prasad Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and his signature is available on the court's copy.

In that view of the matter, the order stands complied. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with liberty to challenge the same, if the petitioner so wants. (Rajiv Roy, J) Ravi/- U