Nazim Akhtar @ Nazim v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36323 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-194 Year-2022 Thana- SIKTI District- Araria ====================================================== Nazim Akhtar @ Nazim S/o Hayat Ali R/o Vill- Dimihaya, P.S.- Sikty, DisttAraria ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner :
Mr. Ravindra Nath Dubey, Advocate For the State :
Md. Ataur Rahman, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 26-09-2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 376, 313, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. As per prosecution case, it is alleged that on the false pretext of marriage, this petitioner established physical relations with the informant as a result of which she became pregnant and when she asked this petitioner to solemnize marriage, she was brutally assaulted.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. Petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case only with a view to put pressure on him to perform marriage. Charge-sheet
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36323 of 2025(3) dt.26-09-2025 2/2 has already been submitted and petitioner is in custody since 28.02.2024. Petitioner claims clean antecedents.
5. On the other hand, learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner and submitted that petitioner is named in the F.I.R. with specific accusation that on the false pretext of marriage, he established physical relations with the informant and thereafter, refused to marry her and also assaulted her. The victim in her statement recorded under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. has supported the prosecution case.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, specific and direct nature of accusation and statement of the victim recorded under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C., the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner is rejected. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T