Patna High CourtCWJC/8897/2014dismissed

Damodar Pathak v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-09-27Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8897 of 2014 ====================================================== Damodar Pathak son of Late Sitaram Pathak resident of village and Post Office Nai Bazar, Police Station - Sikraual, District - Bhojpur at Arrah .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, New Secretariat Building, Bailey Road, Patna - 800001

2. The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, New Secretariat Building, Bailey Road, Patna - 800

3. The Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board, Patna

4. The Secretary, Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board, Patna

5. The District Magistrate, Buxar

6. The District Education Officer, Buxar

7. The Managing Committee, Adarsh Sanskrit High School, Chunni, Buxar .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Verma For the Respondent/s : Smt.Nividita Nirvikar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL ORDER 27-09-2016 The petitioner is said to be Headmaster of Adarsh Sanskrit High School, Chunni, in the district of Buxar. After his death son is demanding compassionate appointment. It is an ill-advised, if not misadvised, writ application which has been filed without verifying the law or Rules in this regard. The school in question is in the hands of private Managing Committee. The policy of compassionate appointment is available to Government servant does not apply to such institutions. Therefore, writ has been filed by the petitioner without understanding the law and without any law supporting such claim

Patna High Court CWJC No.8897 of 2014 (2) dt.27-09-2016 or relief.

This Court, therefore, dismisses the writ application. However, it was a fit case for imposition of cost for wasting valuable judicial time of a constitutional Court. (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) Surendra/- U