Sagar Sahni @ Ram Sagar Sahni v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.48941 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -41 Year- 2015 Thana -TISIAUTA District- VAISHALI(HAJIPUR) ====================================================== Sagar Sahni @ Ram Sagar Sahni Son of Shukhdeo Sahni, Resident of village - Davaichh, P.S. - Tisiauta, District - Vaishali. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ansul, Adv. Mr. Anuj Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Madhura Nand Jha (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 29-01-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Tisiauta P.S. Case No. 41/2015 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 25(1-b)A, 26 of the Arms Act and 17, 18 of C.L.A. Act.

Allegedly, the petitioner was caught and from his possession one loaded country made Katta and another one live cartridge were recovered.

Submission is of false implication, that nothing was recovered from possession of the petitioner but the police after beating him got his signature on the plain paper which has been converted into seizure list and the confessional statement, the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.48941 of 2015 (3) dt.29-01-2016 2/2 petitioner is in custody since 12.06.2015 and as such he deserves sympathetic consideration.

Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer of bail by submitting that the petitioner has got criminal antecedent. In the facts and circumstances stated above, considering the alleged recovery and period of detention, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hajipur, Vaishali in connection with Tisiauta P.S. Case No. 41/2015, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J.) Rakhi U T