← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./51423/2024dismissed

Niranjan Kumar @ Vicky v. The State Of Bihar

2025-01-16Mr. Justice Ashok Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.51423 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-736 Year-2023 Thana- BELAGANJ District- Gaya ====================================================== Niranjan Kumar @ Vicky S/o- Maheshi Mistri Village- Noghar Ps- Belaganj Dist- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar Bihar 2.

Shukh Anshu Kumari D/O Katil Paswan R/O Vill.- Pluhar, P.O.- Jalalpur, P.S.- Tekari, Dist.- Gaya ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Anil Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sadanand Paswan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 16-01-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under section 376 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3 (2) (v) of the SC/ST Act.

3. The case of the prosecution is that the victim of the had gone to attend the call of nature. In the meanwhile, the petitioner arrived there from the back and lift her in lap and established physical relation due to which he got unconscious.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in connection with the present case. Moreover, the petitioner is languishing in judicial

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51423 of 2024(6) dt.16-01-2025 2/2 custody since 19.11.2023 having no criminal antecedent.

5. Learned counsel for the State submits that during the course of investigation, the statement under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. has been recorded in which she has stated that the petitioner has committed rape on her. From perusal of the medical report, it is clear that the doctor has found hymen raptured and opined that rape cannot be denied. As such, the petitioner does not deserve bail.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to extend him the privilege of bail which is accordingly rejected.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Jagdish/- U T