← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/10065/2018disposed

Naresh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2023-01-02Mr. Justice Sanjeev Prakash Sharma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10065 of 2018 ====================================================== Naresh Kumar Son of Sri Sukhdeo Prasad Singh, Resident of Village- Samda, P.O. and P.S.- Haveli Kharagpur, District- Munger. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar and Ors 2.

The Principal Secretary, Education Department Government of Bihar, Vikas Bhawan, New Secretariat, P 3.

The Director, Educaiton Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 4.

The Regional Deputy Director of Education, Munger Division. 5.

The District Education Officer, Munger.

6.

The District Program Officer, Munger.

7.

Bihar Staff Selection Commission, through it's Secretary, P.O.- Veterinary College, Patna.

8.

The Secretary, Bihar Staff Selection Commission, P.O.- Veterinary College, Patna.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Subodh Chandra Jha, Adv.

Mr. Manoj Kesri, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Prabhakar Jha, GP 27 Mr. Umesh Naryan Dubey, AC to GP 27 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA ORAL ORDER 02-01-2023

1. Heard the parties.

2. Keeping in view the law laid down in the Judgment dated 23.02.2022, passed in C.W.J.C. No. 5489 of 2020 (Suresh Ram Vs. The State of Bihar & ors.) and connected matters reported in 2022 (2) B.L.J., 381 and the Judgment dated 07.03.2022, passed in C.W.J.C. No. 34 of 2022 (Minakshi @ Sushre Minakshi & Anr. Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.), the

Patna High Court CWJC No.10065 of 2018(3) dt.02-01-2023 2/2 grievance raised by the petitioner is found to be examined suitably by the District Appellate Authority/State Appellate Authority.

3. If an appeal is preferred before the District Appellate Authority/ State Appellate Authority, the same shall be taken up at the earliest and preferably decided within a period of six months.

4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. (Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, J) Suraj/- Item No. 77 U