Ravindra Prasad @ Ravindra Yadav @ Doctor v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.51237 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -26 Year- 2013 Thana -PARASBIGHA District- JEHANABAD ====================================================== Ravindra Prasad @ Ravindra Yadav @ Doctor, son of Chhotan Yadav, resident of Village- Kajiama Dihuri, P.S.- Paras Bigha, District- Jehanabad .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Suraj Narain Yadav, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. M. Rab, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 29-02-2016 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. representing the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Paras Bigha P.S. Case No. 26 of 2013 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 338, 379, 385, 424, 436, 506, 509 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 17 of the C.L.A. Act.

The petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and it is submitted that on the basis of confessional statement he has falsely been implicated in this case, he has got no concern with the extremist group and without any legal and cogent material he is suffering in custody since 16.03.2015.

The learned A.P.P. fairly submits that the name of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.51237 of 2015 (3) dt.29-02-2016 2/2 the petitioner has come in the confessional statement and the petitioner has got criminal antecedent.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, considering that the charge-sheet has already been submitted and there is no chance of tampering with the prosecution evidence, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Learned Additional Sessions Judge-V, Jehanabad in S.T. No. 195 of 2015/ 186 of 2015 arising out of Paras Bigha P.S. Case No. 26 of 2013, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail. (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J.) ajaypd./- U T