Vimlesh Kumar @ Vimlesh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41539 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-21 Year-2024 Thana- RAJGIR District- Nalanda ====================================================== Vimlesh Kumar @ Vimlesh Yadav S/o Krishna Yadav @ Karu Yadav R/o Vill-jati Bhagwanpur, P. S.-Nalanda, Dist-Nalanda (Biharsharif) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Jay Ram Prasad For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Dilip Kumar No. 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 22-07-2024 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 279, 307, 353 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of Arms Act.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and informant alleges that on 19-11-2023, while he was on duty, he received an information that a scuffle has taken place in between two brothers under jurisdiction of Rajgir police station, accordingly he went to the place of occurrence to pacify the matter between the brothers. It is further alleged that the informant saw a Mahindra tractor being driven rashly and the same came and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41539 of 2024(2) dt.22-07-2024 2/3 dashed the government vehicle, thereafter the tractor was stopped and the driver disclosed his name as Vimlesh Kumar (petitioner) and while the police was trying to take him to police station when he started firing and fled with tractor. 4.

It is next submitted that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that the vehicle of the petitioner was stopped by the police and they were demanding illegal gratification to which the petitioner objected on the ground that since he has done no wrong, why he should pay any bribe on which he was threatened to be implicated in a police case, accordingly he took the tractor and left the place of occurrence and later came to know that a false case has been instituted. It is next submitted that had the petitioner any intention of committing any occurrence then definitely he would not have disclosed his name.

5.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41539 of 2024(2) dt.22-07-2024 3/3 anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Rajgir P.S. Case No. 21 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) SUMIT/- U T