Ramashish Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36834 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-42 Year-2025 Thana- SAKURABAD District- Jehanabad ====================================================== Ramashish Yadav S/o Ram Bali Yadav R/o Village- Mahmanna, PS- Tekari, Distt.- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Anant Kumar 1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 18-06-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Sakurabad P.S. Case No. 42 of 2025 instituted for the offences under Sections 308(2), 308(5) of the BNS.
3. As per the prosecution case, the informant has alleged that in the night of 14.02.2025, three unknown persons threatened the labourers present at the brick kiln and demanded extortion money. It was alleged that all the accused persons were variously armed and they also snatched away the mobile phones of Ravi and Kundan.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36834 of 2025(2) dt.18-06-2025 2/3 Petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. The name of the petitioner transpired in this case during investigation. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that general and omnibus allegation has been made against the petitioner. Learned counsel further submitted that petitioner never demanded any extortion from the labourers and nor any extortion amount was paid to him. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 18.02.2025 and has four criminal antecedents. The co-accused person has already been granted bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 26.05.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 32840 of 2025.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as also the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.
7. Let the petitioner be released on bail, after framing of charge, if not already framed, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Sakurabad P.S. Case No. 42 of 2025, subject to the following conditions:
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36834 of 2025(2) dt.18-06-2025 3/3 (I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of the family of the petitioner.
(II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.
(III) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Rajorshi/- U T