Dinesh Prasad Singh @ Dinesh Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38711 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-766 Year-2024 Thana- BHAGALPUR COMPLAINT CASE District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== Dinesh Prasad Singh @ Dinesh Singh S/O Late Karyanand Singh Resident of Village- Maheshi, P.O- Tilakpur, P.S- Sultanganj, District- Bhagalpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Gauri Shankar Chaudhary S/O Late Parmanand Chaudhary R/O VillageMaheshi, P.O- Tilakpur, P.S- Sultanganj, Distt.- Bhagalpur. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Md.Najmul Hodda, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Diwakar Yadav For the State :

Mr. Madan Kumar APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. B. PD. SINGH ORAL ORDER 27-06-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, opposite party no. 2 and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 766 of 2024 for the offence under Sections 420, 323, 504 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution story, it is alleged by the complainant that the petitioner along with other co-accused persons have misappropriated an amount of Rs. 20 lakhs from him by executing sale deed in favour of the complaint on the basis of forged and fabricated documents. It is also alleged that on 05.05.2024 when he went to the house of petitioner to return his amount upon which accused no. 1 started to abuse and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38711 of 2025(2) dt.27-06-2025 2/3 assault him.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits petitioner is quite innocent and falsely been implicated in this case due to local dirty politics as well as on the instigation of one Kumar Ranvir. No such occurrence ever took place as alleged by the complainant. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that Khatiyan pertaining to sold land is standing in the name of petitioner along with other co-sharers. Petitioner has clean antecedent.

5. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.

6. After hearing both the parties, it appears that there is a bona fide land dispute between the parties and purchaser should have inquired about the matter before purchasing the plot.

7. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts and considering the clean antecedent of the petitioner, let the petitioner be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from the receipt of this order, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., XI, Bhagalpur in connection with Complaint Case No. 766 of 2024

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38711 of 2025(2) dt.27-06-2025 3/3 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(S. B. Pd. Singh, J) prabhakar/- U T