← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./49762/2015bail granted

Santosh Kumar Barnwal @ Fauji v. The State Of Bihar

2015-12-11Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.49762 of 2015 (3) dt.11-12-2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.49762 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -20 Year- 2015 Thana -CHANDRAMANDI District- JAMUI ======================================================

1. Santosh Kumar Barnwal @ Fauji Son of Late Harihar Prasad Barnwal Resident of Village-Karahariya, P.S.-Bhagbanpur, District-Begusarai. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Satya Prakash Parasar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Iftekhar Mahmood (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 11-12-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Chandramandih P.S. Case No. 20 of 2015 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 394, 412 of the Indian Penal Code.

The petitioner is not named in the FIR, he has been remanded in this case on 27.05.2015, nothing has been recovered from his possession, he has not been put on test identification parade and only on the basis of confessional statement he is suffering in custody and chargesheet has already been submitted. Co-accused Baski Yadav and Pankaj Kumar Chaudhary have already been allowed bail vide Cr. Misc. No. 53336 of 2015 by

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.49762 of 2015 (3) dt.11-12-2015 another co-ordinate Bench of this Court.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Amit Kumar, J. M. Ist Class, Jamui in connection with Chandramandih P.S. Case No. 20 of 2015, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail. (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) avin/- U T