Santosh Kumar v. The Power Grid Corporation Of India Ltd.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2025 of 2019 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1274 of 2019 ====================================================== Santosh Kumar Son of Ram Pravesh Thakur R/o Panchsheel Nagar, Post Office and Police Station-Barh, District-Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd. through its Chairman cum Managing Director, Saudmani Plot No. 2, Sector 29, Gurgaon -122001, Haryana 2.

The Director (Personnel) Saudmani Plot No. 2, Sector 29, Gurgaon -122001, Haryana 3.

The General Manager (HR) Saudmani Plot No. 2, Sector 29, Gurgaon -122001, Haryana 4.

The Deputy General Manager (HRO, Odisha Project) Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd. Plot No. 4, Unit 41, Niladri, Bihar, Chandrashekharpur, Bhubaneswar-751021 5.

The Chief Manager (HR) (Odisha Project) Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd. Plot No. 3, Unit 41, Niladri, Bihar, Chandrashekharpur, Bhubaneswar751021 6.

Executive Director Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd. Plot No. 4, Unit 41, Niladri, Bihar, Chandrashekharpur, Bhubaneswar-751021 ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms. Nivedita Nirvikar, Sr. Advocate Mr. Subodh Kumar Barnwal, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. S.P. Singh, Sr. Advocate Mr. Kunal Tiwary, Advocate Mr. Arbind Kumar Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 06-07-2022 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

The order dated 22.01.2019 is alleged to have not been complied with by the respondents.

Patna High Court MJC No.2025 of 2019 dt.06-07-2022 2/2 On perusal of the order dated 22.01.2019, this Court finds that there was no direction to anyone of the respondents. In that view of the matter, there is no necessity of continuing with this petition.

The counsel for the respondents, however, submits that a representation which was filed by the petitioner has already been disposed of.

Should the petitioner feel aggrieved by the aforesaid order passed by the authority, he would have the liberty to agitate against the same before an appropriate forum. The petition is consigned and disposed off accordingly.

(Ashutosh Kumar, J) krishna/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 09.07.2022 Transmission Date