← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/1556/2018dismissed

Sanjay Singh v. The State Of Bihar Through The Home Secretary, Government Of Bihar, Patna Namely Mr. Amir Subhani A

2023-04-20Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar,Mr. Justice Harish Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1556 of 2018 In Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1609 of 2017 ====================================================== Sanjay Singh Son of Late Shiv Shankar Singh, Resident of Village- Panwari, P.S.- Sikaruhattar, District- Bhojpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar through The Home Secretary, Government Of Bihar, Patna Namely Mr. Amir Subhani 2.

The Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna namely Mr. K.S. Devidi. 3.

The Inspector, General of Police, Patna Zone, Bihar, Patna namely Mr. Nair Husnain Khan.

4.

The Deputy Inspector General of Bihar, Shahabad Range, Dehri DistrictRohtas namely Dr. Kumar Ekla y 5.

The Superintendent of Police, Rohtas namely Mr. Manavjeet Singh Dhillon. 6.

The Station House Officer Cum Investigating Officer Bikramganj, DistrictRohtas namely Rajesh Sorain 7.

Parmanand Singh, Son of Late Raj Ballabh.

8.

Satish Singh @ Kariya Singh, Son of Parmanand Singh. 9.

Gautam Singh @ Loha Singh, Son of Parmanand Singh. 10.

Chhotu Singh, Son of Parmanand Singh, Serial No. 7 to 10 are resident of Village- Dharupur, P.S.- Bikramganj, District- Rohtas. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None For the Opposite Party/s :

Dr. Mankeshwar Tiwary, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR) 20-04-2023 Nobody appears on behalf of the petitioner.

Dr. Mankeshwar Tiwary, learned counsel for the State, however, submits that the order has been

Patna High Court MJC No.1556 of 2018(8) dt.20-04-2023 2/2 complied with.

In view of such statement having been made by the counsel for the State, we find no reason to keep this petition pending.

Petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to approach this Court if the statement made by the counsel for the State is found to be wrong. (Ashutosh Kumar, J) ( Harish Kumar, J) Anjani/- U