Patna High CourtCR. MISC./49742/2015bail granted

Jeetendra Kumar v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2015-11-06Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.49742 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -66 Year- 2015 Thana -IMAMGANJ District- GAYA ======================================================

1. Jeetendra Kumar Son of Suryadeo Prasad Resident of Village - Kujeshar, P.S. - Imamganj, District - Gaya (Bihar).

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dudheshwar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anil Kumar Singh 1(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 06-11-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

In this case, the petitioner is seeking bail in connection with Imamganj P.S. Case No. 66/2015 registered for offences under sections 323 and 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner is in custody since 02.06.2015. There is allegation that the petitioner has entered into the marriage with opposite party No 2 Madhu Kumari and started torturing his wife for dowry that led to filing of present case. The petitioner is in custody since 02.06.2015.

Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case and also the nature of allegation, let the petitioner, Jeetendra Kamar, be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.49742 of 2015 (2) dt.06-11-2015 P2/2 thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Sherghari, Gaya in connection with Imamganj P.S. Case No. 66 of 2015, subject to the condition that (i) one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner (ii) if the petitioner is found involved in future in similar type of case, the prosecution will be at liberty to make prayer for cancellation of his bail and the court below will pass necessary order, including cancellation of bail and (iii) the petitioner would cooperate the proceeding of the court below. In event of failure to appear on two consecutive dates, the court below will be at liberty to pass the order, including cancellation of bail bonds.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) Saif/- U T