Rakesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37035 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-323 Year-2025 Thana- VISHNUPAD District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.

Rakesh Kumar S/O Krishna Mohan Prasad R/O Upardih, Nai Sadak, Ward No. 40, P.S.- Vishnupad Temple, Dist.- Gaya.

2.

Brajesh Kumar S/O Krishna Mohan Prasad R/O Upardih, Nai Sadak, Ward No. 40, P.S.- Vishnupad Temple, Dist.- Gaya.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ajay Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Yogendra Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 16-06-2026

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned A.P.P. for the State and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 190, 329 (3), 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 110, 352, 351(2) of the B.N.S., 2023.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that on account of dispute relating to land, accused persons including the petitioners came and Rakesh (petitioner no.1) assaulted by Fasuli causing injury on forehead, while

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37035 of 2026(2) dt.16-06-2026 2/3 Brajesh (petitioner no.2) assaulted Asmit by rod causing injury on head.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that on account of dispute relating to land, an altercation took place in which both side assaulted each other. It is further submitted that even presuming what has been alleged is true without admitting then the injury suffered by the informant and Asmit has been opined to be simple in nature and the blow was not repeated. It is also submitted that petitioners are not criminals.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Vishnupad P.S. Case No.323 of 2025, subject to

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37035 of 2026(2) dt.16-06-2026 3/3 the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) amit/- U T