Patna High CourtMJC/776/2018disposed

Jay Rice Mills, Through Its Proprietor Namely, Pawan Kumar @ Pawan Kumar Singh v. Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Managing Director, Bihar State Food And Civil Supplies Corporation, Patna And ORS

2019-02-06Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.776 of 2018 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14277 of 2016 ====================================================== Jay Rice Mills, through its Proprietor, namely, Pawan Kumar @ Pawan Kumar Singh, son of Nirmal Kumar Singh, resident of P.O. + P.S. Bihata, District Patna ... ... Petitioner

Versus

1. Mr. Pankaj Kumar, son of not known, Managing Director, Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation, Patna(Bihar)

2. Me. Prabhu Das, son of not known, District Manager, Bihar State Food & Civil Supplies Corporation, Patna (Bihar)

3. Mr. Buddha Prakash, son of not known, District Manager, Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation, Patna (Bihar) ... ... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Binod Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Partis :

Mr. Nirmal Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 06-02-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the opposite parties.

2. The present petition has been filed for initiating a contempt proceeding against the opposite parties for willful disobedience of the judgment of this Court dated 23.11.2017 passed in CWJC No. 14277 of 2016.

3. A show cause has been filed on behalf of opposite party no. 3, Annexure-A whereof being an order dated 08.01.2019 passed by the Deputy General Manager, (Purchase & Law), Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation, Headquarter, Patna discloses that a final

Patna High Court MJC No.776 of 2018 dt.06-02-2019 2/2 decision has been taken by the authorities and thus it is submitted that the order of this Court stands complied with.

4. In the above view of the matter, MJC No. 776 of 2018 stands disposed of with liberty to the petitioner that in case it is aggrieved by the order of the authorities as noticed above, it may agitate the same before an appropriate forum in accordance with law, if so advised. BT/Chandran (Vikash Jain, J) AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N.A.

Uploading Date 09.02.2019 Transmission Date N.A.