Bhim Ram v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.52374 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -156 Year- 2015 Thana -BARHARIA District- SIWAN ====================================================== Bhim Ram Son of Bhagwan Ram Resident of village - Hardiya, P.S. - Barhariya, District - Siwan.
.... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner : Mr. Ranjeet Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the State : Mr. Durgesh Nandan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN ORAL ORDER 14-12-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for offences punishable under Sections 399/402 of the Indian Penal Code. It is contended on behalf of the petitioner that nothing has been recovered from his personal possession and he was not apprehended from the spot.
However, learned counsel for the State has submitted that as per averment made in paragraph 3 of this application, the petitioner is involved in several other cases. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner, namely, Bhim Ram is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.52374 of 2015 (2) dt.14-12-2015 Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siwan, in Barhariya P.S. Case No. 156/15 with a further condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner must be his one of the parents who shall file affidavit before the concerned court giving complete genealogy to show his / her relationship with him. Further, if the petitioner, after his release in this case, is again found to be involved in criminal case of similar nature, the court concerned would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds.
That apart, in view of the antecedents of the petitioner, he would be required to appear before the Superintendent of Police, Siwan within fifteen days of his release with a copy of this order and every two weeks thereafter for the next six months. The conduct of the petitioner will be kept under watch in the aforesaid period by the Superintendent of Police concerned and if it is found wanting in any respect, a report shall be made to the court concerned by him to initiate a proceeding for cancellation of bail for reasons of misuse of bail. After reporting to the Superintendent of Police, a certificate will be filed by the petitioner before the court concerned which should be granted by the Superintendent of Police upon his appearance.
(Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J) SC/- U T