← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./37175/2022bail granted

Pramod Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2022-07-27Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37175 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-444 Year-2020 Thana- ARA NAGAR District- Bhojpur ====================================================== PRAMOD YADAV SON OF- LATE MUSHA YADAV RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - MOTI TOLA, P.S- ARA TOWN, DISTRICT BHOJPUR ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

M/s Surendra Kumar Singh Prabhat Kumar Singh, Advocates For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Navin Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 27-07-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The petitioner has renewed his prayer for grant of regular bail in a case registered under sections 307, 452, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and section 27 of the Arms Act.

As per the prosecution case, Dhanji Yadav is said to have fired hitting the informant in his chest while Dharmendra Yadav fired hitting the informant.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the earlier application for bail of the petitioner was rejected vide order dated 7.2.2022 (Annexure-1) passed in Cr. Misc. No. 35983 of 2021. It is submitted that the specific allegations as per the FIR are against Dhanji Yadav and Dharmednra Yadav while

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37175 of 2022(2) dt.27-07-2022 2/2 the allegations against the petitioner and others are general and omnibus in nature. The case of the petitioner stands on a similar footing to that of co-accused Kundan Yadav who has been enlarged on bail vide order dated 8.6.2022 passed in Cr. Misc. no. 718 of 2022. The petitioner is in custody since 27.2.2021 and investigation in the case has concluded.

Heard learned APP for the State.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the nature of allegation in the FIR, grant of bail to co-accused Kundan Yadav together with the petitioner having remained in custody since 27.2.2021, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail in connection with Ara Town P.S. Case no. 444 of 2020 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur at Ara.

(Partha Sarthy, J) Spd/- U T