← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/4328/2016disposed

Pushplata Devi v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-09-20Justice Smt. Anjana Mishra,The Chief Justice2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4328 of 2016 ======================================================

1. Pushplata Devi Wife of Dhanshyam Prasad Resident of Sakhini Mohalla Ramnagar, Ward No. 2, P.O. Nawada, P.S. Nawada, District - Nawada .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The District Magistrate, Nawada

3. The Sub - Divisional officer, Nawada Sadar, Nawada

4. The Circle officer, Nawada

5. The Executive officer, Nagar Parishad, Nawada

6. The Executive Engineer in Chief, Minor Irrigation, Bihar, Patna

7. The Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Works Division, Nawada

8. The Sub - Divisional officer, Minor Irrigation, Nawada .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pramod Kumar Verma For the Respondent/s : Mr. Binod Ji Verma, GP-17 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 20-09-2016 Heard Mr. P.K.Verma, learned Counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. Binod Ji Verma, learned GP-17, appearing for the Staterespondents. The grievance of the writ petitioner, made in this writ petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, in the nature of Public Interest Litigation, relates to encroachment of public path/public road.

Having regard to the facts pleaded in this writ petition, the materials on record and, having heard learned counsel for both

Patna High Court CWJC No.4328 of 2016 (2) dt.20-09-2016 the parties, we find that the subject matter of this writ petition is fully covered by the observations made, and the directions given by us in the case of Sanjay Jha Vs. The State of Bihar and Others, reported in 2016 (1) PLJR 248.

In view of the above and in the interest of justice, it is hereby directed that respondent No.2, namely, District Magistrate, Nawada, and respondent No.3, namely, Sub-Divisional Officer, Nawada Sadar, Nawada, shall act, in the present matter, in accordance with law, keeping in view the observations made and the directions given in the order, dated 24.11.2015, aforementioned.

In view of the above, this writ petition is accordingly disposed of.

(I.A. Ansari,CJ) (Anjana Mishra, J) A.I./- U