Amit Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36959 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-62 Year-2022 Thana- MURLIGANJ District- Madhepura ====================================================== AMIT KUMAR YADAV Son of Late Letrohim Prasad Yadav Resident of Village - Fatehpur, P.S.- Sultanganj, District - Bhagalpur. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Uday Chand Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Md. Aslam Ansari, A.P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 30-11-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
Let the defect(s), if any, be removed within a period of four weeks.
The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 188 and 144 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent. The informant, who is a police officer, alleges that on 07.02.2022 while patrolling a video clip came to him showing a man firing on D.J. song. Accordingly, for verification of the same he reached the place of occurrence and there he was informed by the local people that at the time of immersion of Goddess Saraswati the occurrence had taken place in which the bodyguard
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36959 of 2022(2) dt.30-11-2022 2/2 of the Mukhiya had made happy firing.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is further submitted that the villagers, who are anti Mukhiya, have falsely implicated his bodyguard. It is next submitted that even presuming what has been alleged is true without admitting then no injury was caused to anyone though it is submitted at the cost of repetition that petitioner never fired.
Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Murliganj P.S. Case No. 62 of 2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U T