← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./41532/2024bail granted

Shambhu Pandit v. The State Of Bihar

2024-07-03Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41532 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-51 Year-2024 Thana- SIMRI District- Darbhanga ====================================================== Shambhu Pandit SON OF CHANDRA SHEKHAR PANDIT RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- ARAI, P.S.- SIMRI , DIST- DARBHANGA ,BIHAR ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vinay Kumar Mishra For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Dr. Indiwar Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 03-07-2024 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and allegation is of recovery of 40 litres of liquor from the house of the petitioner and 5.22 litres of liquor from a wheat field. 4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was not arrested from the spot as such nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and after the amendment in the Excise Act in the year 2018, the concept of deemed possession and presumed offender has been done away

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41532 of 2024(2) dt.03-07-2024 2/3 with. It is next submitted that the house in question is a joint family property as such it cannot be alleged with certainty that it was petitioner who had kept the liquor in the house or the liquor kept in the house within knowledge of the petitioner. It is next submitted that he came to be implicated based on secret information which is the easiest way to implicate someone. 5.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 500/- (Rupees Five Hundred) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Simri P.S. Case No. 51 of 2024 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

7.

It is made clear that the learned trial court before accepting the bail bonds of the petitioner shall verify the criminal antecedents of the petitioner and in the event if it is found that the petitioner has antecedent of even one case in that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41532 of 2024(2) dt.03-07-2024 3/3 event the present anticipatory bail order shall not be given effect to.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) SUMIT/- U T