Krishna Rai v. State Of Bihar And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.51953 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -862 Year- 2003 Thana -SARAN COMPLAINT CASE DistrictSARAN ======================================================
1. Krishna Rai son of Shankar Rai, Resident of village- Jilkabad, Mathiya, P.S.- Garkha, District- Saran .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Kiran Devi wife of Krishna Rai, Daughter of Late Vishwanath Pd. Yadav, Resident of village- Jilkabad, Mathiya, P.S.- Garkha, District- Saran at Chapra, presently residing at Bijali Vadhar, P.S.- Chapra Moffasil, District- Saran at Chapra .... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Girijish Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. R.S. Chaudhary (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL ORAL ORDER 15-12-2015 Heard both sides.
The husband of the complainant is the petitioner seeking bail in connection with Complaint case no. 862 of 2003 registered under Sections 323,341,498A, 494, 506 of the IPC and section 3⁄4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.
It is submitted that the complaint was filed in 2003. The petitioner is languishing in jail custody since 16.6.2015. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to extend the privilege of bail to the petitioner. Let the petitioner, named above, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.51953 of 2015 (2) dt.15-12-2015 2/2 sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Saran at Chapra, in connection with Trial no. 215 of 2015, arising out of Complaint case no. 862 of 2003 with following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors shall be the own/close family member of the petitioner.
(ii) As soon as the charges are framed the petitioner shall appear in person before the trial court on the date(s) fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two consecutive dates, the trial Court shall have liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner and secure his arrest in accordance with law.
(Kishore Kumar Mandal, J) Shyam/- U T