Sanjeet Kumar @ Sanjit Kumar Chauhan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39811 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-113 Year-2024 Thana- PHULWARIYA District- Gopalganj ====================================================== Sanjeet Kumar @ Sanjit Kumar Chauhan SON OF Satyendra Chauhan Vill -Harihara Ps- Phulwaria Dist -Gopalganj. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Biha. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shubhesh Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Syed Mojibur Rahman, APP For the Informant : Mr. Lokesh Kumar Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 10-07-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 506 & 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. All the F.I.R. named accused including this petitioner is said to have assaulted the informant's son and his family members.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that no such occurrence as alleged ever took place. He has been falsely implicated in this case due to land dispute. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. Both the parties are agnates and there is admitted land dispute between the parties. It is further submitted that the petitioner is working in a reputed

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39811 of 2024(2) dt.10-07-2024 2/2 company at Mumbai and on the date of occurrence he was at Mumbai. It is further submitted that the real fact of the matter is that the informant's side is trying to grab the land of the petitioner's side for which the scuffle took place. It is further submitted that although the son of the informant has sustained two grievous injury but the petitioner is not the author of the said injury. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.

5. Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail.

6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case as well as the fact that the injury sustained by the victim has not been inflicted by the petitioner, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Phulwaria P.S. Case No. 113 of 2024, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) Trivedi/- U T