Shambhu Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.46519 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-92 Year-2021 Thana- KARAKAT District- Rohtas ====================================================== 1.

SHAMBHU SINGH Son of Bal Mani Singh Resident of Village- Sugibal, Police Station- Karakat, District- Rohtas.

2.

SONU SINGH @ SONU KUMAR SINGH Son of Sushil Singh Resident of Village- Mohanpur, Police Station- Karakat, District- Rohtas. 3.

SANJAY SINGH @ SUJEET KUMAR Son of Gupteshwar Singh @ Budhan Singh Resident of Village- Mohanpur, Police Station- Karakat, District- Rohtas.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shankar Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Rabindra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 17-12-2021 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to remove defect(s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of four weeks from today.

This application for grant of anticipatory bail arises out of Karakat P.S. Case No. 92/2021 registered for the offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act, 2016.

In view of the fact that prima facie a case under the Excise Act, is made out against the petitioners, this application for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners is not

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46519 of 2021(2) dt.17-12-2021 2/2 maintainable in view of Full Bench decision of this Court rendered in the case of Ram Vinay Yadav vs. The State of Bihar reported in 2019(2) P.L.J.R. 1089 (F.B.).

Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as not maintainable.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) Saif/- U T