Manoj Sapera v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.45806 of 2023 In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16767 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-745 Year-2020 Thana- JAHANABAD District- Jehanabad ====================================================== Manoj Sapera Son Of Nagina Sapera Resident Of Village- Samwey @Sambe, Ps- Warisaliganj, Dist- Nawada ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Bijendra Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Lakshmi Kant Sharma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 19-07-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned APP for the State.

The present modification application has been filed for modify the order dated 12.05.2023 passed in Cr. Misc. 16767 of 2023.

By the order dated 12.05.2023, the petitioner was granted bail with the following conditions :-

1. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45806 of 2023(2) dt.19-07-2023 2/3

2. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

3. And further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to communication gap on the basis of the information furnished by the pairvikar, it was stated in paragraph-3 of the bail petition that the petitioner carries one more case instead of two more cases other than the present one.

The Court also noticed Section 362 of Cr. P.C. it reads as follows :- "362- Court not to alter judgment. Save as otherwise provided by this Code or by any

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45806 of 2023(2) dt.19-07-2023 3/3 other law for the time being in force, no Court, when it has signed its judgment or final order disposing of a case, shall alter or review the same except to correct a clerical or arithmetical error." In the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the instant modification petition is dismissed.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) mdrashid/- U T