Sudhir Kumar Sinha @ Sudhir Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11100 of 2019 ====================================================== Sudhir Kumar Sinha @ Sudhir Kumar Singh Son of late Kedar Nath Sinha, Resident of Village Chaudhrain Chak, P.O. Masathu, P.S. Barh, DistrictPatna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Secretary, Human Resource Department, Bihar, Patna.

2.

The District Magistrate, Patna.

3.

The District Superintendent of Education, Patna. 4.

The District Teacher Employment Appellate Authority, Patna Situated at Computer Bhawan, Rajkiya Bal High School, Bankipur, Gol Ghar, Patna. 5.

The Block Education Extension Officer, Barh, District- Patna. 6.

The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj, Ekdanga, Barh, Patna. 7.

The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj, Ekdanga, Barh, Patna. 8.

Shobha Kumari, W/o Sri Sanjay Kumar, Resident of Village- Chaudhrain Chak, P.O. Masathu, P.S. Barh, District- Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ashok Kumar Sinha No.3, Advocate.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Amit Bhushan AC to G.P. 17.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 15-10-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

In view of the judgment of the full Bench in the case of Kalpana Rani Vs. State of Bihar & Ors. Reported in 2014

(2) PLJR 665, the issue of Siksha Mitra is now a closed chapter. So far as claim of the petitioner that respondent No. 8 was appointed on the basis of forged certificate is concerned, the issue of appointment on the basis of forged certificate is opened

Patna High Court CWJC No.11100 of 2019(3) dt.15-10-2019 2/2 for scrutiny at the level of the respondents and if it is found that appointment was procured on the basis of forged certificate, the State authority shall take appropriate decision with regard to appointees on the basis of forged certificate. In the process the respondents shall consider the the judgment of the Division Bench reported in 2019 (1) PLJR 165 and pass appropriate order at the earliest preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. With the aforesaid, the present writ application stands disposed of.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) T.Kr./- U