Patna High CourtCWJC/9433/2014withdrawn

Manish Kumar And ANR v. The Union Of India And ORS

2015-03-18Mr. Justice Mihir Kumar Jha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9433 of 2014 ======================================================

1. Manish Kumar son of Kumar Barun, resident of village Barmasia, Post and Police Station Jhajha, District Jamui

2. Dilip Kumar Thakur, son of Shri Ram Pravesh Thakur, resident of village and P.O. Virpur, Police Station Jurawanpur, District- Vaishali .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The Union of India, through its Principal Secretary, Ministry of Personal Public Grievances and Pensions, Department of Personal and Training, Block 12, CGO Complex, Lodi Road, New Delhi- 3.

2. Staff Selection Commission, through its Chairman, Ministry of Personal Public Grievances and Pensions, Department of Personal and Training, Block 12, CGO Complex, Lodi Road, New Delhi- 3.

3. Staff Selection Commission (Eastern Region), through its Regional Director, null Staff Selection Commission (Eastern Region), 1st M.S.O. Building (8th Floor), 234/4, A.J.C. Bose Road, Kolkata West Bengal

4. Regional Director, Staff Selection Commission (Eastern Region), 1st M.S.O. Building (8th Floor), 234/4, A.J.C. Bose Road, Kolkata West Bengal

5. Staff Selection Commission (Madhya Pradesh Regiiona), through its Deputy Director, Nishant Vila, F-Jal Vihar Colony, Raipur, Chhattisgarh

6. Deputy Director, Staff Selection Commission (Madhya Pradesh Region) Nishant Vila, F-Jal Vihar Colony, Raipur, Chhattisgarh .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajesh Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. Lal Babu Singh, Adv.

For the Respondent/s : Mr. Rajesh Kumar Verma, CGC ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MIHIR KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 18-03-2015 Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty to withdraw this application stating that the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed. This part of the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is not opposed by the learned counsel for the respondents.

That being so, this application is dismissed as

Patna High Court CWJC No.9433 of 2014 (2) dt.18-03-2015 withdrawn.

(Mihir Kumar Jha, J) Rishi/- U