Prithvi Kumar @ Prithvi Chauhan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35647 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-234 Year-2024 Thana- HAJIPUR SADAR District- Vaishali ====================================================== Prithvi Kumar @ Prithvi Chauhan S/o Anu Prasd Chauhan @ Annu Prasad Chauhan R/o Ward No- 07, Dighi Kala East, Dighi Kala, Dist -Vaishali, Bihar- 844102 ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ansul, Sr. Advocate Mr.Anuj Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Shahabuddin Azeem @ S. Azeem, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 12-06-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Sadar Hajipur P.S Case no.234 of 2024 registered under sections 420 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, the informant states that on the pretext of showing him the way, one of the accused persons started to drive his tempo. Thereafter, it is stated that he disappeared with the vehicle of the informant.

4. Learned Senior counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the FIR was registered against unknown. Referring to the material that has transpired in course of investigation as evident from the order of the learned trial Court, it is submitted that the name of the petitioner transpired in the confessional statement of co-accused made before police. Inspite of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35647 of 2025(2) dt.12-06-2025 2/2 petitioner being in custody since 21.1.2025, he has not been put on T.I parade and chargesheet has been submitted in the case. No incriminating article has been recovered from the petitioner's possession and the reason for his false implication is his antecedents.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned A.P.P for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegation against the petitioner in the FIR, the material that has transpired in course of investigation as evident from the order of the learned trial Court and chargesheet having been submitted in the case without putting the petitioner on T.I parade inspite of his being in custody for more than 4 months since 21.1.2025, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail in connection with Sadar Hajipur P.S Case no.234 of 2024 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali, Hajipur.

(Partha Sarthy, J) Shiv/- U T