← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./46358/2021bail rejected

Madhusudan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2022-09-27Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.46358 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-238 Year-2019 Thana- TEGHRHA District- Begusarai ====================================================== Madhusudan Yadav Son of Late Shibu Yadav @ Shibu Ray Resident of village - Paigambarpur, P.s. - Teghra, District - Begusarai. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pankaj Kumar Singh, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Rajendra Prasad Nat, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 27-09-2022 Let the defect(s), if any, be removed within two weeks from today.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Teghra P.S. Case No. 238 of 2019 lodged under Sections 302, 304(B), 120(B) and 34 of the I.P.C.

As per the prosecution case, the death of informant's sister as well as informant's niece took place by hanging. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He further submits that he is a man of clean antecedent and he is father-inlaw aged about 55 years. He submits that the husband is already in custody and the petitioner is in judicial custody since

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46358 of 2021(5) dt.27-09-2022 2/2 03.12.2020. Charge has not framed in this case. Learned counsel for the State submits that it is a case of Section 304(B) and husband is the father-in-law. Case is of 2019 but even after lapse of 3 years till date charge has not framed.

In the present facts and circumstances of this case and the submissions made above, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner but liberty is hereby granted to the petitioner to move for bail 3 months after framing of charge and the Trial Court is directed to release him on bail imposing condition so that he may not evade from the trial.

With this observation, the bail application stands rejected.

(Dr. Anshuman, J.) prakashmani/- U T