Rohit Raj @ Dharmendra Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37103 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-178 Year-2017 Thana- LAHERIMUHALLA District- Nalanda ====================================================== ROHIT RAJ @ DHARMENDRA KUMAR SON OF RAM ISHWAR CHOUDHARY RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- HASANGANJ DHEKAWAHA, P.S.- ISLAMPUR BARAI, DISTRICT- NALANDA ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Nitya Nand Neeraj, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Narsingh Tanti, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 01-12-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that petitioner cheated him of Rs. 3,60,000/- in the name of providing job, further some amount was deposited in the account of brother of the petitioner, next when job was not provided, the informant asked for his money back on which he was threatened.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case, it is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37103 of 2022(2) dt.01-12-2022 2/2 next submitted that if what has been alleged in the F.I.R is true, then the informant is equally liable for being punished for seeking job through backdoor or by giving bribe as seeking backdoor appointment through illegal means in itself is an offence. It is also submitted that petitioner has been falsely implicated, it is next submitted that Court will not come to aid of a person who himself commits act in breach of the law. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Laheri P.S. Case No. 178 of 2017 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishabh/- U T