Akshay Kumar @ Raju v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 52058 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -35 Year- 2015 Thana -RAMPUR CHAURAM District- JEHANABAD ====================================================== Santoshi Chaudhary S/o Dukhi Chaudhary, resident of VillageParsurampur, P.S.- Parasi, District- Arwal. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== with Criminal Miscellaneous No. 52063 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -35 Year- 2015 Thana -RAMPUR CHAURAM District- JEHANABAD ====================================================== Akshay Kumar @ Raju S/o Late Ramashish Mahto, resident of VillageNagwan, P.S.- Kinjar, District- Arwal. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

(In Cr.Misc. No.52058 of 2015) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Krishna Pd. Singh, Sr.Adv. Mr. Rakesh Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Bharat Bhushan (App) (In Cr.Misc. No.52063 of 2015) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Krishna Pd. Singh, Sr.Adv. Mr. Rakesh Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Bharat Bhushan(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 01-12-2015 Heard Sri Krishna Prasad Singh, learned senior counsel, who was assisted by Sri Rakesh Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner(s) and Sri Bharat Bhushan, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor.

In both the aforesaid bail petitions, petitioners are in

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.52058 of 2015 (2) dt.01-12-2015 2/2 custody in Rampur Chauram P.S. Case No. 35 of 2015 registered for the offence under Sections 386, 387 of the Indian Penal Code, Sections 25(1-B)A, 26, 35 of the Arms Act, 1959 and Sections 13, 17, 20 & 40 of U.A.P. Act and as such, both the petitions were heard together and are being disposed of by this common order. At the very outset, it was submitted by learned senior counsel for petitioner(s) that in this case, one of the co-accused has been granted bail by this Court on 17-09-2015, vide Cr.Misc. No. 42737 of 2015.

Learned Addl. Public Prosecutor has opposed the prayer of bail.

However, keeping in view the nature of accusation and period of custody, let the petitioner of both the cases namely Santoshi Chaudhary and Akshay Kumar @ Raju be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Arwal/concerned court in connection with Rampur Chauram P.S. Case No. 35 of 2015.

(Rakesh Kumar, J.) Anay U T