Manoj Sahni v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37262 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-280 Year-2022 Thana- LALGANJ District- Vaishali ====================================================== 1.
Manoj Sahni Son Of Lakhindra Sahni Resident Of Village - Sirsa Khasi @ Sisrauli, P.S. - Lalganj, District - Vaishali 2.
Okil Sahni Son Of Late Jamun Sahni Resident Of Village - Sirsa Khasi @ Sisrauli, P.S. - Lalganj, District - Vaishali 3.
Rajesh Sahni Son Of Lakhindra Sahni Resident Of Village - Sirsa Khasi @ Sisrauli, P.S. - Lalganj, District - Vaishali ... ... Petitioners
Versus
The State Of Bihar, Patna ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Awadhesh Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Vinod Shanker Modi ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 31-07-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324 and 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code pending in the learned court below.
3. As per the prosecution case, petitioners along with other co-accused persons are said to have inflicted the informant by means of knife.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that there is admitted land dispute
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37262 of 2023(2) dt.31-07-2023 2/2 between the parties. He submits that there is no specific overt act against the petitioners to inflict the informant by means of knife. He further submits that there is allegation against the petitioners that they have caught hold the informant. He further submits that petitioner nos. 1 & 3 have got no criminal antecedent and petitioner no.2 has got one criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail application.
5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioners, named above, in the event of their arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Court below, where the case is pending/Successor court, in connection with Lalganj P.S. Case No.280/2022, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) ajay/- U T