← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/14552/2021dismissed

Sunil Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2023-12-20Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14552 of 2021 ====================================================== Sunil Kumar son of Nageshwar Singh, resident of 1912, Sector-3, Pushp Vihar, P.O.- Pushpa Bhawan, P.S.- Saket, South Delhi, Delhi, PIN- 11001, permanent resident of Village- Gopalpur, Pachrukhi, P.O. and P.S. Pachrukhi, District- Siwan, PIN- 841241.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, General Administration Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Bihar Staff Selection Commission, Veterinary College Campus, Patna, through its Secretary.

3.

The Chairman, Bihar Staff Selection Commission, Veterinary College Campus, Patna.

4.

The Secretary, Bihar Staff Selection Commission, Veterinary College Campus, Patna.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Pankaj Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Sheo Shankar Prasad (Sc8) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 20-12-2023 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following reliefs:- "1(I) To direct the respondents to appoint the petitioner according to merit position in the respective department in terms of order dated 18.05.2021 passed in CWJC No.10857 of 2019 and its analogous cases on being identical and on similar footing.

(II) To hold and declare that the petitioner is entitle of the benefit of his appointment and posting along with arrears of salary, pay protection and other allowances being

Patna High Court CWJC No.14552 of 2021(2) dt.20-12-2023 2/2 consequential from the date of appointment and joining of similarly circumstance other persons have been appointed.

(III) To direct the respondents to consider the appointment of petitioner forthwith being otherwise eligible in terms of judicial pronouncement of this Hon'ble Court."

2.

After some arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to approach the respondentauthorities for redressal of his aforesaid grievance. Liberty, so sought, is granted.

3.

The writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) kanchan/- U