Shiv Kumar Chanani v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14555 of 2021 ====================================================== Shiv Kumar Chanani, Son of Tulsi Ram Chanani, Resident of 301 Kokil Campus, Manna Singh Lane, North Sri Krishnapuri, Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Building Construction Department, Government of Bihar, Visheshwaraiya Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.

2.

The Chief Engineer, Building Construction Department, Government of Bihar, Visheshwaraiya Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna. 3.

The Executive Engineer, Central Division, Building Construction Department, Patna.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Anjani Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Manoj Kr. Ambastha, SC 26 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) (The proceedings of the Court are being conducted by Hon'ble the Chief Justice/Hon'ble Judges through Video Conferencing from their residential offices/residences. Also the Advocates and the Staffs joined the proceedings through Video Conferencing from their residences/offices.) Date : 19-01-2022 Petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s):-

2/4 After the matter was heard for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner, under instructions, states that petitioner shall be content if a direction is issued to the authority concerned i.e. Respondent No. 3 namely The Executive Engineer, Central Division, Building Construction Department, Patna to consider and decide the representation which the petitioner shall be filing for redressal of the grievance(s). Learned counsel for the respondents states that if such a representation is filed by the petitioner, the authority concerned shall consider and dispose it of expeditiously and preferably within a period of three months from the date of its filing along with a copy of this order.

Statement accepted and taken on record.

3/4 As such, petition stands disposed of in the following terms:- (a) Petitioner shall approach the authority concerned i.e. Respondent No. 3 namely The Executive Engineer, Central Division, Building Construction Department, Patna by filing a representation for redressal of the grievance(s); (b) The authority concerned shall consider and dispose it of expeditiously by a reasoned and speaking order preferably within a period of three months from the date of its filing along with a copy of this order;

(c) Needless to add, while considering such representation, principles of natural justice shall be followed and due opportunity of hearing afforded to the parties; (d) Equally, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to take recourse to such alternative remedies as are otherwise available in accordance with law;

(e) We are hopeful that as and when petitioner takes recourse to such remedies, as are otherwise available in law, before the appropriate forum, the same shall be dealt with, in accordance with law and with reasonable dispatch; (f) Liberty reserved to the petitioner to approach the

4/4 Court, if the need so arises subsequently on the same and subsequent cause of action;

(g) We have not expressed any opinion on merits of the matter. All issues are left open;

(h) We expect that the appropriate authority shall consider and decide the petitioner's application/request expeditiously and preferably within a period of three months from the date of its presentation.

The petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms. Interlocutory Application(s), if any, stands disposed of. (Sanjay Karol, CJ) ( S. Kumar, J) Sujit/- AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date 21.01.2022 Transmission Date