Hari Shankar Singh v. Union Bank Of India

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11662 of 2019 ====================================================== 1.

Hari Shankar Singh, S/o Late Ram Subhag Singh, Resident of Village and Post Mohammadpur, P.S. Garkha,Dist.-Garan 2.

Smt. Rubby Singh, W/o Shri Hari Shankar Singh Resident of Village and Post Mohammadpur, P.S. Garkha,Dist.-Garan ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

Union Bank of India A body corporate Constitute Under Banking Companies,Acquisition and Transfer of Unertaking Act,1970 having its Head Office at Union Bank Bhawan Opposite Vidhan Bhavan, 239 Viodhan Bhavan Marg, Nariman Point,Mumbai,India-400021. 2.

The Zonal Manager, Union Bank of India,53,Abhay Bhawan,Frazer Road,Patna,Bihar-800001 3.

The Regional Manager Regional Officer,Samastipur, Panchawati Complex,Mohanpur Road,Samastipur,Pin-848101.

4.

The Authorized Officer, Regional Office,Samastipur,Panchawati Complex,Mohanpur Road,Samastipur,Pin-848101.

5.

The Branch Manager, Union Bank of India Chapra Branch,Srinandan Path,Salempur,Chapra (Saran) 6.

The State of Bihar through the District Magistrate,Saran at Chapra. 7.

Sub-Divisional Officer, Saran at Chapra 8.

Circle Officer, Garkha Saran at Chapra 9.

Presiding Officer, Debts Recovery Tribunal,Patna 10.

Recovery Officer, Debts Recovery Tribunal,Patna ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Sajid Salim Khan (SC25) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 29-11-2022 The petitioners have prayed for the following relief/s :- "(i) Quashing the auction advertisement

Patna High Court CWJC No.11662 of 2019(3) dt.29-11-2022 2/2 dated 15.4.2019 regarding Om Suraya Naneh Cold Storage Published on 21.4.2019 in Dainik Bhaskar. (ii) Issuance of writ of Mandamus Commanding the Respondents to settle the loan amount according to the Guideline of Reserve Bank of India."

On 25.11.2022 we had passed the following order :- "Perhaps the present petition has become infructuous, inasmuch as, challenge is to the advertisement putting the property to auction way back in the year 2019.

Despite repeated calls, none has entered appearance on behalf of the petitioners.

However, in the interest of justice, matter is adjourned.

List on 29th of November, 2022, in the category of "Order Matters".

Even today, despite repeated calls, none has entered appearance on behalf of the petitioners. However, learned counsel for the respondent/s is/are present.

As such, the present petition stands dismissed for default.

(Sanjay Karol, CJ) ( Partha Sarthy, J) Ashwini/Sujit U