Raju Kumar Sah v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33745 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-202 Year-2018 Thana- SONPUR RAIL P.S. District- Saran ====================================================== Raju Kumar Sah, Son of Ashok Sah, Resident of Village - Durgapur, P.S.- Manjhi, Distt - Saran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Binod Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Asha Devi, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 22-05-2019 Petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Sonpur Rail P.S. Case No.202 of 2018 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 379, 411 & 414 of the Indian Penal Code.

Prosecution story is that petitioner was arrested when he alighted from the train and four mobile phones were recovered from him and petitioner admitted that those mobiles are stolen mobiles.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that he has falsely been implicated in this case and having no criminal antecedent and he is in custody for more than six months.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the facts and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33745 of 2019(2) dt.22-05-2019 2/2 circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Railway, Sonpur, District Saran, in connection with Sonpur Rail P.S. Case No.202 of 2018, subject to the condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

It is made clear that at the time of release of the petitioner, the learned trial court to verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner. If the petitioner is found having no clean antecedent, this order will have no effect. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T