← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/10731/2020withdrawn

Surya Kuer @ Surya Kunver v. The State Of Bihar

2021-08-16Mr. Justice Chakradhari Sharan Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10731 of 2020 ====================================================== 1.

Surya Kuer @ Surya Kunver W/o- late Bhikhari Tiwari Resident of Village Kumhau, P.O.- More Sarai, P.S. Shivsagar, District- Rohtas at Sasaram, presently resident at Satyendra Nagar (in the house of Ramadhar Dubey) Block Colony, Aurangabad, P.S. and District- Aurangabad. 2.

Usha Kuer W/o- late Ajit Kumar Tiwary Resident of Village Kumhau, P.O.- More Sarai, P.S. Shivsagar, District- Rohtas at Sasaram, presently resident at Satyendra Nagar (in the house of Ramadhar Dubey) Block Colony, Aurangabad, P.S. and District- Aurangabad.

... ... Petitioners

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar Bihar.

2.

The Principal Secretary, Department of Land Reforms and Revenue, Govt. of Bihar, Patna (Bihar).

3.

The Consolidation Director, Patna Bihar.

4.

Mr. Nawal Kishor, Joint Director of Consolidation, Patna Bihar. 5.

The District Magistrate, Rohtas (Sasaram).

6.

Consolidation Officer, Block- Shivsagar, Dist- Rohtas. 7.

The Circle Officer, Block- Shivsagar, Dist- Rohtas. 8.

Dineshwar Tiwari S/o- late Triveni Tiwari resident of Village- Kumhau, P.S.- Shivsagar, Dist- Rohtas.

... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners :

Mr.Bijay Shankar Choubey For the Respondents :

Mr.Ashok Kumar Pandey :

Mr.Sajid Salim Khan (SC 25) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER 16-08-2021 This matter has been taken up for hearing online because of COVID-19 pandemic restrictions.

Learned counsel for the petitioner after some argument seeks permission to withdraw this application with a liberty to prefer an appeal before the Bihar Land Tribunal

Patna High Court CWJC No.10731 of 2020(2) dt.16-08-2021 2/2 against the impugned order.

Learned counsels appearing on behalf of the State and respondent no. 8 have no objection to such prayer. This application is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty, as sought.

It goes without saying that if any question of limitation arises, the Tribunal shall consider any application for condonation of delay liberally, keeping in mind the present pandemic situation and the fact that the petitioner was pursuing his remedy before this Court by filing present writ application. (Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) AKASH/- U