Raja @ Rajwa @ Sunil Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38026 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-745 Year-2019 Thana- SASARAM NAGAR District- Rohtas ====================================================== RAJA @ RAJWA @ SUNIL KUMAR SON OF LATE RAJENDRA SINGH R/O- VILL- AMRA TALAB, P.S.- SASARAM (T), DIST.- ROHTAS AT SASARAM ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Bindeshwar Prasad Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 31-08-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.
The petitioner has renewed his prayer for bail in a case registered under sections 302, 379 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and section 27 of the Arms Act.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the earlier prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected vide order dated 30.6.2021 (Annexure-1) passed in Cr. Misc no. 5169 of 2021 giving liberty to the petitioner to renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge. Inspite of the petitioner being in custody since 19.9.2019 the trial is still continuing and there is no chance of the same concluding in the near future. The prayer for bail is opposed by learned A.P.P for the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38026 of 2022(3) dt.31-08-2022 2/2 State and learned counsel for the informant. It is submitted by learned counsel for the informant that P.W 2 Ajay Singh, during course of trial gave specific statement that the petitioner fired upon deceased from his pistol. It is further submitted that the informant is cooperating in the trial and is producing the remaining witnesses on each date fixed by the learned trial Court.
Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the facts of the case specially the deposition of P.W. 2 in course of trial wherein he made specific allegation of the petitioner being an assailant having fired from a pistol, the Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and the application is rejected.
Learned trial Court is directed to expedite the trial. (Partha Sarthy, J) Prakash/- U