Vipeen Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.40582 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -80 Year- 2016 Thana -TEKARI District- GAYA ======================================================

1. Vipeen Kumar Son of Virendra kumar @ Virendra Singh Resident of Village - Khemkhanran Sarai, Kurtha P.S. Kurtha, District- Arwal .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Satya Veer For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anil Kumar Singh-I(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER 22-09-2016 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. This application, for grant of anticipatory bail, arises out of Tekari Police Station Case No. 80 of 2016, disclosing offences under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code.

From paragraph 3 of the application, it appears that he has been made accused in another case, being Tekari Police Station Case No. 394 of 2016, for offences punishable under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering the gravity of the offence, I am not inclined to grant the petitioner privilege of anticipatory bail. This application for anticipatory bail, is hereby, rejected.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.40582 of 2016 (2) dt.22-09-2016 2/2 The petitioner, Vipeen Kumar, is directed to surrender before the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and seek regular bail, if so advised. If he does so, his application for regular bail shall be considered by the learned Court below on its own merit without being prejudiced by rejection of present application for grant of anticipatory bail.

(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J.) Prabhakar Anand/- U √ T √