Gholta Tanti @ Gholti Kumar Tanti And ANR. v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.29507 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -80 Year- 2015 Thana -AMARPUR District- BANKA ======================================================
1. Gholta Tanti @ Gholti Kumar Tanti, son of Naresh Tanti
2. Bino Tanti @ Bino @ Binba Tanti, son of Naresh Tanti Both resident of Village- Kashpur, P.S.- Amarpur, District- Banka. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dhananjay Kumar Gupta For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md. Ansural Haque (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 29-10-2015 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the learned A.P.P.
The petitioners seek bail in a case for the offences punishable under sections 366A/34 of the I.P.C Allegedly, Sajni Devi, the sister of the informant, had gone to attend the call of the nature with co-accused Rambha Devi at 7 P.M. but she did not return and Rambha Devi told that two boys came on the motorcycle and took her away forcibly towards Amarpur.
Submission is of false implication and that the victim girl has given her statement under section 164 of the Cr.P.C vide Annexure-2 wherein she has stated that she was taken away by
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.29507 of 2015 (3) dt.29-10-2015 2/2 petitioner no.2 on the motorcycle but has not alleged that she was sexually harassed by him and as such the petitioners who are suffering in custody since 18.04.2015 deserve sympathetic consideration, to which the learned A.P.P. opposes. In the facts and circumstances as stated above, as the victim has not stated regarding any sexual harassment in her statement recorded under section 164 of the Cr.P.C, vide Annexure-2, and as such the petitioners are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M. Banka in Amarpur P.S. Case No.
80 of 2015, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioners shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on their part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioners from privilege of bail.
(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) Abhay/- U T