Arun Kumar Mishra v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.93 of 2021 ====================================================== Arun Kumar Mishra S/O Late Bimal Mishra resident of Village- Kechua, P.O.- Sakla Bazar, P.S.- Karakat Gorari, Distt- Rohtas at Sasaram. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Revenue and Land Reform Department, Bihar, Patna.
2.
The Director, I.C.D.S. (Integrated Child Development Services), Bihar, Patna.
3.
The District Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram.
4.
The District Program Officer, Rohtas at Sasaram. 5.
The Circle Officer, Karakat Gorari, Rohtas at Sasaram. 6.
The Child Development Program Officer, Karakat Gorari, District- Rohtas at Sasaram.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Anish Chandra, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Mr.Lalit Kishore (AG) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 20-07-2022 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following reliefs:- "That by way of this writ application the petitioner crave indulgence of this Hon'ble Court for an order(s)/direction(s) to the respondents for stopping of construction work being carried out of Anganwari Centre by Directorate of Integrated Child Development Services (I.C.D.S.), Bihar on Khata No. 118, Khesra No. 282, Ward No.- 8, villageKachua, Gram Panchayat Raj Sonvarsha under P.S. Karakat, District-Rohtas at Sasaram situated in front of /adjacent to the land of ancestors of the petitioner,
Patna High Court CWJC No.93 of 2021(2) dt.20-07-2022 2/2 where the land in question having boundary wall erected around bearing Khata No. 116, Khesra No. 531 & 532, Ward No. 8 in village-Kechua, P.S. Karakat Gogari, District-Rohtas at Sasaram."
The respondents have filed a counter affidavit and have submitted that the building of Aanganbari Centre is being constructed over government land, hence the petitioner has no locus to challenge the same.
Nonetheless, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to approach the District Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram for redressal of his aforesaid grievances.
Liberty so sought is granted.
The writ petition stands disposed off.
(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) S.Sb/- U