Shobha Sah And ORS. v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 5699 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -182 Year- 2015 Thana -KURSELA District- KATIHAR ======================================================
1. Shobha Sah son of Umi Sah
2. Munna Sah son of Jago Sah
3. Kailalsh Sah son of Mahendra Sah All are resident of village- Sameli, P.S.- Kursela, District- Katihar. .... .... Petitioners
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajit Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anil Pd. Singh(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2.
19-02-2016 Heard Sri Ajit Kumar Singh, learned counsel for petitioners and learned Addl. Public Prosecutor. Three petitioners, apprehending their arrest in Kursela P.S. Case No. 182 of 2015 registered for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 332, 333, 353, 337 and 435 of the Indian Penal Code, have prayed for grant of anticipatory bail. Initially, it was submitted by learned counsel for petitioners that an accident had taken place in which, a school bus was collided with a truck. In the said accident, several children received injury. It was specifically submitted by learned counsel for petitioners that in the accident, two sons of the petitioner no. 2 died and as such, there was no reason for petitioners, particularly
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.5699 of 2016 (2) dt.19-02-2016 2/2 petitioner no. 2, to be one of the participants in the occurrence, as alleged by the informant, whereas, on perusal of the impugned order, it appears that before the court below, the submission was made that two sons of petitioner no. 2 was injured and they were treated. Meaning thereby that submission of learned counsel for petitioners that two sons of petitioner no. 2 died appears to be not correct.
In view of nature of accusation, I do not find any ground to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail. The petition stands dismissed.
(Rakesh Kumar, J.) Anay U T