Phulpati Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1786 of 2018 In Letters Patent Appeal No.405 of 2013 ====================================================== Phulpati Devi, W/o Late Kishori Prasad Singh, Resident of Village-Dhanuki Mahavana, P.O.-Sakraichak, P.S. Janipur, Distt.-Patna, at present resident at Muhalla-Ashok Nagar, Road No. 8/A/4, Kankarbagh, P.S. Kankarbagh, District-Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar.

2.

Mr. Pankaj Kumar, I.A.S., the Principal Secretary, Department of Food and Consumer Protection, Old Secretariat, Patna.

3.

The Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd., Birchand Patel Marg, Sone Bhawan, Patna, through its Managing Director Mr. Pankaj Kumar I.A.S.

4.

Shri Pankaj Kumar, the Managing Director, Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd., Birchand Patel Marg, Sone Bhawan, Patna. 5.

Shri Kundan Kumar, the Chief of Claim, Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd., Birchand Patel Marg, Sone Bhawan, Patna. 6.

Shri S.B. Bhattarcharya, the Chief of Finance, Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd., Birchand Patel Marg, Sone Bhawan, Patna. 7.

Md. Islam, the District Manager, State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd., Chapra.

8.

Dr. B.P. Singh, Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, Employees Provident Fund Organization, Sub-Registered Office, Muzaffarpur. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Chitranjan Kumar Sinha, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Anisul Haque, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR) 20-04-2023 Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

Patna High Court MJC No.1786 of 2018(4) dt.20-04-2023 2/2 The petitioner though contends that wrongly it has been calculated that she is only liable to paid an amount of Rs. 6,76,143/-, but such issues could be raised by the petitioner in an appropriate forum, challenging such decision including the calculation of the respondents.

So far as the compliance of the order passed by the Division Bench of this Court is concerned, the same stands complied with.

In that view of the matter, the present contempt petition is dismissed.

(Ashutosh Kumar, J) (Harish Kumar, J) Praveen-II/- U