Ram Padarath Rai And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13929 of 2002 ======================================================

1. Ram Padarath Rai son of Late Harihar Rai

2. Ram Prit Rai son of Late Harihar Rai

3. Prithvi Nath Rai son of Lae Harihar Rai

4. Mathura Prasad Rai son of Late Harihar Rai

5. Kedar Nath Rai son of Late Harihar Rai All are residents of Village Mirzapur, P.S.Sonpur, District Saran .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Additional Collector, Chapra, Saran

3. Deputy Collector, Land Reform, Sonpur, Saran

4. Bijwanti Devi wife of Babu Ram Rai, resident of Village Mirzapur, P.S.Sonpur, District Saran

5. Secretary, Bharpura Mirzapur Math Nyas Samiti, P.S.Sonpur, District Saran

6. Mahanth Kameshwar Puri, Mirzapur Math, P.O. Bharpura, P.S Sonpur, District Saran .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 : Mr. Abbas Haider, SC 6 Mr.S.Hussain Majeed, AC to SC 6 For the Respondent no.4 : Mr.Ashish Giri, Advocate For the Respondent no.6 : Mr.Pratik Kr.Sinha, Advocate Mr.Ram Swarup Prasad, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER 26-07-2016 Despite repeated calls, none appears on behalf of the petitioners in support of the present writ petition, though the name of the learned counsel appearing on their behalf is printed in the daily cause list.

The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents, on the other hand, submits that the order impugned cannot be legally faulted.

Be that as it may, since none is appearing on behalf of the petitioners, the writ petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution.

(Birendra Prasad Verma, J) Tahir/- U