Patna High CourtCWJC/10028/2014disposed

Rameshwar Thakur v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-02-05Mr. Justice Kishore K. Mandal2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10028 of 2014 ===========================================================

1. Rameshwar Thakur, Son of Late Bifan Thakur, resident of Village- Saidpur Dhawa, P.S.- Arwal, District- Arwal .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Agriculture Production Commissioner, Patna Bihar

2. The Director Agriculture Department, Government of Bihar, Patna

3. The Collector, District- Arwal

4. The Block Development Officer, Karpi, District- Arwal

5. The District Treasury Officer, District- Arwal

6. The Accountant General, Bihar, Patna .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arvind Prasad Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr. GA9-A.K. SINHA =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 05-02-2016 Heard the counsels for the petitioner and the State as well as the Accountant General. A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the respondent no. 6.

The petitioner after serving the State Government in the Department of Agriculture as Village Level Worker (VLW) retired on 30.11.1999. Indisputably, all retrial dues are authorized/paid to him. The present writ application seeks a direction upon the respondents to revise the pension of the petitioner upon grant of benefits under Assured Career Progression (ACP) scheme implemented by the State Government.

Patna High Court CWJC No.10028 of 2014 dt.05-02-2016 2/2 In the counter affidavit of the Accountant General, it has been stated that a request in this regard was made by the office of Accountant General to the Block Development Officer (BDO), Karpi Arwal. Upon receipt of a communication dated. 29.01.2015 granting benefits under the ACP scheme, the pension has already revised. In support of the said contention, Annexure-A series have been enclosed.

Having heard the parties, it appears that the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed. The application stands disposed of as having become infructuous. Needless to observe that if the petitioner has any grievance with respect to the calculation of the dues, he may approach the appropriate/Competent Authority ventilating the said grievance.

(Kishore Kumar Mandal, J) rohit/- U