Sagir Alam v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35599 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1 Year-2025 Thana- BARAULI District- Gopalganj ====================================================== Sagir Alam S/o Amanullah Ansari @ Amnullah Resident of Village Gulam Hussain Tola, P.S.- Manjhagarh, Distt. Gopalganj .. ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Adesh Raj Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Madhura Nand Jha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 20-06-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Barauli P.S. Case No. 01 of 2025 instituted for the offences under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 317(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Sections 66(i)(ii) of the IT Act.

3. As per prosecution case, the accusation against the accused persons including the petitioner is of being involved in Cyber Crime. It is further alleged that police recovered several ATM Cards and Mobile phones from the accused persons including the petitioner.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35599 of 2025(2) dt.20-06-2025 2/2 possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel further submitted that petitioner has got no concern with the recovered ATM Cards or the SIM Cards. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 07.01.2025 and has no criminal antecedent. There is no compliance of Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nagarika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. Learned APP further submitted that the allegation levelled against the petitioner is serious in nature. Learned APP further submitted that the prayer for grant of bail to the co-accused person has already been rejected by this Court vide order dated 12.05.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 28069 of 2025.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, nature and gravity of offence, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Accordingly, the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner is, hereby, rejected.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Alok Verma/- U T