Sunil Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.53181 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -192 Year- 2014 Thana -NOORSARAI District- NALANDA (BIHARSHARIFF) ====================================================== Sunil Kumar, son of Late Gurku Yadav @ Chhote Yadav, Resident of Village- Dedhghara, P.S.- Rahui, Dist- Nalanda. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Sudish Kumar For the Opposite Party : Mr. S.Ehteshamuddin(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 16-02-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner is accused in connection with Noorsarai P.S. Case No. 192 of 2014, registered under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that it would appear from the F.I.R. that on the basis of the written report of Md. Saidu Jafar, Noorsarai P.S. Case no. 192 of 2014, under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code was instituted against four unknown. In course of checking of vehicle the stolen motorcycle recovered with petitioner regarding which Asthawan P.S. Case No. 121 of 2015, under section 413, 414 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code was instituted on 14.07.2015 and petitioner has been remanded in the present case on 29.07.2015. In the aforesaid case

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.53181 of 2015 (3) dt.16-02-2016 2/2 petitioner has been granted bail by this Court vide Cr. Misc. No. 45601 of 2015, dated 13.10.2015. Further submission is that while informant has stated about age of the four culprits in between 20-25 years in F.I.R, but the petitioner has not been put on T.I.P. for identification.

Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nalanda in connection with Noorsarai P.S. Case No. 192 of 2014. Out of two sureties, one surety must be the close relative of the petitioner, who will file an affidavit showing his relation with the petitioner and further the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during the course of the trial in the court below. If the petitioner fails to remain present on two consecutive dates during the course of the trial without any reasonable cause being shown, the court concerned would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) manish/- U T