← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./40884/2019allowed

Ram Bilash Pandit v. The State Of Bihar

2020-06-26Mr. Justice Chakradhari Sharan Singh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40884 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-465 Year-2013 Thana- BHAGALPUR COMPLAINT CASE District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== RAM BILASH PANDIT Son of Late Shital Pandit Resident of Mohalla - Mahmadabad, P.O.- Mirjanhat, P.S.- Mozahidpur, (O.P.Bajrang), DistrictBhagalpur ... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Manorma Devi Wife of Sitaram Pandit through Bishnudev Pandit Resident of Village - Digdhi, P.S.- Nathnagar, District- Bhagalpur, Permanent Address - Resident of Village, P.O. and P.S.- Amarpur, District- Banka ... ... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Brij Nandad Prasad For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar Tiwary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER 26-06-2020 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

This application for anticipatory bail arises out of Complaint Case No. 465 of 2013 for the offence punishable under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged in the complaint petition that the petitioner had introduced one Deepak Kumar as an L.I.C. Agent. On persuasion of said Deepak Kumar, the complainant is said to have taken L.I.C. policy. Allegedly, the said Deepak Kumar received considerable amount in the name of depositing premiums against the said policy. The complainant subsequently

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40884 of 2019(8) dt.26-06-2020 2/3 learnt that the amount paid by her to said Deepak Kumar to the tune of Rs.77,044/- has been misappropriated for his personal use.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that there is no allegation against the petitioner of misappropriation of any amount and only allegation against him is of introducing said Deepak kumar as an Agent of L.I.C.

Considering the nature of allegation made in the complaint petition against the petitioner, this application is allowed.

Let the petitioner above named, in the event of his arrest/surrender within six weeks from today in the Court below, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M.-IX, Bhagalpur, in Complaint Case No. 465 of 2013, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

This is subject to the condition that the petitioner shall present himself before the Police/Court, as the case may be, as and when required and in the event of failure on his part to

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40884 of 2019(8) dt.26-06-2020 3/3 appear before the Court on two consecutive occasions, his bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled.

(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) Pawan/- U T