Himanshu Ranjan @ Chhotu Sharma v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48854 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-159 Year-2018 Thana- HULASGANJ District- Jehanabad ====================================================== Himanshu Ranjan @ Chhotu Sharma Son of Rakesh Kumar Sharma @ Munna Sharma Resident of Village - Emadpur, P.S.- Hulasganj, Distt.- Jehanabad at Present Resident of Mohalla - East Gandhimaidan, P.S. and Distt.- Jehanabad.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Ramakant Sharma,Sr.Adv.
Mr.Lakshmi Kant Sharma For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Aditya Narayan Singh.1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2.
23-11-2021 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
The petitioner seeks bail in Hulasganj P.S. Case No. 159 of 2018, registered for the offence under Sections 379, 356/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
The prosecution case, in brief, is that six miscreants, boarded as passengers, in the vehicle of informant and when they reached near village Jagua Bigha Pool, all the miscreants, including informant, stepped down for attending call of nature, then all of a sudden, they (miscreants) pushed informant in water and all the culprits took away his vehicle. It is submitted on behalf of petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case only on the basis of fact
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48854 of 2021(2) dt.23-11-2021 2/2 that some miscreants were calling one person by the name of Himanshu or Chhotu i.e. name of petitioner and later on, father of the informant claimed to identify the photograph of petitioner, however; neither father of the informant nor sister of the informant have got opportunity to see the miscreants at the time of occurrence. Petitioner is in custody since 03.10.2018 i.e. more than three years.
Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the bail petition.
Considering the period of custody, the bail petition of petitioner is allowed. Let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Jehanabad in connection with Hulasganj P.S. Case No. 159 of 2018 (Tr. No. 2771 of 2018). (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J.) anay U T